9. Integrated plant protection (IPM) |
The Principles of Integrated Plant Protection have to be applied. Preventive (indirect) measures and observations in the field on pest, disease and weed status must have been considered before intervention with direct plant protection measures takes place
|
9.1 Prevention (= indirect plant protection)
|
The prevention and/or suppression of key pests, diseases and weeds can be achieved or supported among other options especially by the:
- Choice of appropriate resistant/tolerant cultivars.
- Use of an optimal replanting interval or similar strategy to prevent diseases and weakness.
- Use of adequate cultivation techniques, (e.g. green cover, pruning, removal of infected prunings, alternate mowing); pruning not only removes dead tissues but also allows proper ventilation and more effective spray coverage.
- Use of balanced fertilisation (especially low nitrogen input) and irrigation practices.
- Protection and enhancement of important natural enemies by adequate plant protection measures.
- Utilisation of ecological infrastructures inside and outside production sites to enhance a supportive conservation biological control of key pests by antagonists.
IP guidelines must (see 8.1.3.c) describe a basic selection of preventive measures that have to be implemented.
The prevention and/or suppression of key pests and diseases must be supported among other options especially by the:
- Plantation of resistant or less susceptible cultivars.
- The protection and enhancement of beneficial organisms / key natural enemies (e.g. insect parasitoids or predators).
- Use of appropriate cultivation techniques (e.g. balanced fertilization, green cover, pruning, removal of infected prunings, alternate mowing); pruning not only removes dead tissues but also allows proper ventilation and more effective spray coverage;
- Use of optimum fertilization (especially low nitrogen input) and irrigation practices;
- Ecological infrastructures inside and outside production sites to enhance a supportive conservation biological control of key pests by antagonists.
- Avoid insecticide treatments as much as possible to prevent outbreaks of secondary pests.
Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly)
- Cultivation practices that may reduce the damages of the major olive pest, Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly) should be followed i.e. harvesting at the earliest possible time, short harvest period and stripping all the olive fruits from the tree. Tillage after harvest, not before, to prevent negative effects on predation of B. oleae pupae. Infestation of B. oleae may be constrained in part by planting resistant cultivars. Avoid the interplanting of susceptible, large drupe varieties, with the more tolerant cultivars for oil production. Avoid the excess irrigation because the olive fly population is much favoured in irrigated olive groves.
Verticillium
- In case of previous crops being host plants of Verticillium consider the pathogen level in the soil and then proper cultivars should be selected or solarization to be applied.
|
The prevention and/or suppression of key pests and diseases should be supported among other options especially by:
- Hygiene, proper disinfection or cleaning of buildings, clothes, hands, tools, booms, tanks, sprayers and machines is recommended.
- Preventing the carryover of organisms which transmit a phytohygenic damage potential, when spread.
Examples: Weeds like Cyperus esculentus or Rorippa palustris, nematodes like Globodera rostochiensis, fungi like Plasmodiophora brassicae with machines.
The prevention and/or suppression of key pests and diseases should be supported among other options especially by:
- Choice of appropriate resistant/tolerant cultivars is recommended.
- Use of methods to reduce the overwintering inoculum of the pathogens as a measure for delaying/reducing the disease epidemics in the next season is highly recommended.
- Pruning, irrigation and elimination of other wood damaging factors may control pests such as scales and scolytids or diseases.
- Take into account any adjacent abandoned olives groves that may act as sources of pests and diseases.
Anthracnose
- Removal of dead twigs and mummified fruits will reduce inoculum of Anthracnose.
Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly)
- Plants favouring presence of parasitoids can be used to enrich the vegetation cover.
|
9.2 Risk assessment and monitoring
|
Interventions to control pests, diseases and weeds must be based on adequate monitoring methods and tools to determine whether and when to apply direct control measures.
Robust and scientifically sound warning, forecasting and early detection/diagnosis systems (decision support systems) as well as sound threshold values are essential components for decision making.
The official forecasts of pest and/or disease risks, or officially established threshold levels defined for the region must be taken into account before treatments.
A monitoring plan for pests and diseases should be established based on the local experience. Treatments should be based on pest presence/levels and damage thresholds (to be periodically revised) taking in consideration the weather forecast, especially the temperature trend. Strict compliance with the officially established measures to avoid the risk of Xylella fastidiosa entry in new regions has to be a priority in risk assessment and prevention.
Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly)
- Monitoring of the olive fruit fly should start by traps established in late spring and baited with ammonium salts or protein hydrolysates, or using traps with food, sexual and/or visual attractants. The infestation level on the fruits should be recorded.
Closterotomus (Calocoris) trivialis
- Can locally cause damages when high numbers occur from early emergence of flower buds until the flowering period. Monitoring has to be implemented and when dense populations occur on the trees in the critical period, then sprayings can be applied.
|
Empirical threshold values should be replaced by more scientifically sound approaches, like DSS, and expert systems.
Use of mathematical models and regionally adapted Decision Support Systems (DSS) to take decisions about whether, when and where it is necessary to apply pesticides is strongly recommended.
When information from large-scale decision support tools (e.g., official warning systems, DSSs) is used, it is strongly recommended to adapt this information to local and farm conditions, by accounting for weather variability, pest distribution in the field, natural enemies, cultivar susceptibility, sanitary status of the orchard, previous pesticide sprays, etc.
|
9.3 Direct plant protection method
|
Where indirect plant protection measures are not sufficient to prevent a problem and forecasts and threshold values indicate a need to intervene with direct plant protection measures, priority must be given to:
- Those measures which have the minimum impact on human health, non-target organisms and the environment.
- Biological, biotechnical* and physical methods must be preferred above chemical methods if they provide satisfactory control.
*: Biotechnical control methods are defined in applied entomology as highly specific procedures that influence the behavior or development of pests without direct biocidal activity, such as mating disruption, deterrents, sterile insect technique.
Wherever a control measure is deemed necessary, a biological, physical or biotechnical control method must be used if available and effective e.g.
Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly)
- Bait sprays: With this method, the quantity of sprayed insecticide is greatly reduced 'spot spaying' (in comparison to cover sprays as well as the damage to beneficial and other fauna. These sprays should start at the beginning of fruit kernel hardening, taking into account several other criteria such as trap catches (based on an effective monitoring system), temperature, wind speed and relative humidity data, the % of fertile females in the population and local experience. Effectiveness of the method depends also on careful and early monitoring to determine the hot spot areas in the region (i.e. favorable for olive fruit fly microclimate, trees with unharvested fruits, susceptible varieties, irrigated or abandoned farms that may act as sources of the pest).
- Lure & kill techniques: Food and sex attractant traps impregnated with insecticides McPhail or bottle types of traps baited with food attractant represent environmentally safer methods for olive fly control. A dense net of bait traps with or without sex pheromone (mass trapping) can be established in late spring or early summer before the commencement of fly oviposition, and further extended in September, if needed. After establishment, close monitoring with bait traps and fruit sampling should follow. Bait sprays should be applied in cases of high fly populations as indicated in McPhail captures or fruit infestations.
- Biological control: Natural enemies such as larval and pupal parasitoids or epigeal predators and fungi may be active but generally they do not suppress the pest below economically significant levels. Suitable cover crops may support the regulatory effect of natural enemies
- Cover sprays: Reliance on cover sprays would require frequent applications that may have a detrimental impact on the beneficial and other fauna and may contribute to the appearance of new infestations of secondary pests and development of resistance. Cover sprays can be applied based on economic thresholds depending on the variety and region, generally lower for table and higher for olive oil varieties. Cover sprays only to be applied in specific cases of high infestations.
Prays oleae (olive moth)
- Damage to young fruit can be serious in certain regions and varieties (depending also on plant/canopy management). Monitoring of the moth population by sex pheromone traps always combined with flower or fruit infestation monitoring is essential.
- Several natural enemies are active against this pest and should be protected. Sprayings against anthophagous larvae are only applied in cases of low percentage of olive flowering and high population density of the pest. In these cases Bacillus thuringiensis can be used.
- Treatments with compatible selective insecticides should be applied to prevent the entry of hatched larvae in young fruit.
Saissetia oleae and other scales (Parlatoria oleae, Aspidiotus nerii etc.)
- Can be efficiently controlled by beneficial fauna.
- Cultural methods such as pruning and moderate use of nitrogen fertilizers are is of major importance
- Monitoring is based on sampling to estimate the population density as well as the % of parasitism and the presence of honeydew or sooty mould.
In case of outbreaks selective insecticides have to be applied during the hatching period.
|
Weed management should be achieved, as far as possible, by non-chemical methods.
Where important natural enemies are absent from olive-groves where the pest situation requires regular control measures (e.g. parasitoids of scale insects), key natural enemies (one of them usually the predator Chrysoperla carnea, the second one representing important insect parasitoids (especially against scales or the olive fly) or another predator like Anthocoris spp.) should be introduced, if available and effective.
Bactrocera oleae (olive fruit fly)
- Localised bait sprayings based on monitoring systems and DSS are strongly advised for olive fly control.
Verticillium
- Verticillium wilt can be a serious disease in irrigated plantings and in olive crops intercropped with cotton, potato or other susceptible crops. It is essential to avoid planting on infected soil and use pathogen-free propagation material or use resistant/tolerant cultivars. Soil solarisation can contribute to the control of the disease.
Palpita (Margaronia) unionalis
- May be damaging in nurseries and young trees and can be controlled by the use Bacillus thuringiensis.
Zeuzera pyrina
- Causes mining of branches causing destruction of part or entire canopies. Monitoring with traps for timely control or mating disruption can control this pest. Also direct application of pesticides in mines can be effective when possible.
Otiorhynchus spp.
- May cause strong damages to young leaves and shoots especially on young plants; synthetic fiber strips on the trunk can prevent adult damages to the canopy.
Fusicladium oleagineum
- Can defoliate canopies in humid and rainy areas; copper treatment in spring and autumn can control this disease.
Rhynchites cribripennis
- Cause feeding holes in young fruits that cause fruit drop. When high densities occur at the end of the flowering period then sprayings can be applied.
|
9.3.1 Restrictive use of pesticides
|
IP guidelines must (see 8.1.3.d) classify pesticides (to be used for the key pests, diseases and weeds) in three categories: 'permitted' (green list), 'permitted with restrictions' (yellow list) and 'not permitted' (red list) based upon±
- Their toxicity to man
- Their toxicity to key natural enemies
- Their toxicity to other non-target organisms
- Their pollution potential for the environment (soil, water, air)
- Their ability to stimulate pests and diseases
- Their selectivity
- Their persistence
- Their potential to develop resistance in target
- Incomplete or missing information
- The necessity of use.
Regularly updated data on the eco-toxicological profiles of pesticides are compiled by IOBC cf. toolbox).
All agrochemicals used must fulfil the basic requirements of GAP.
- The plant protection product applied must be officially approved for the target, as indicated on the product label, or for officially approved off-label uses.
- In countries that have no official registration schemes yet, reference is made to the FAO Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides.
- All pesticide applications must comply with the statutory conditions regarding the specific crop, maximum permitted total dose, maximum number of treatments, spray intervals and pre-harvest interval, as indicated on the product label or authorised off-label uses.
- Since label doses are maximum doses approved by the registration authorities, reduced dosages are possible, (especially in herbicides).
Chemical soil disinfection is not allowed.
Based on the general criteria, the following categorization of certain pesticides and pesticide groups is established. It may require up-dating with the development of new products.
Not Permitted
- Toxic, water polluting or very persistent herbicides (e.g. Diquat, Paraquat)*.
Permitted with Restrictions
The following categories of compounds don't fit in IPM schemes, however sometimes might be unavoidable. Therefore restrictions are required (yellow list principle):
- Broad-spectrum pesticides: precise indication and only for strictly limited number of applications,
- Dithiocarbamate fungicides due to their average high or middle toxicity towards the auxiliaries,
- Sulphur (dosage must be limited to non-toxic levels so that predatory Phytoseiid mites are not affected),
- Fungicides and insecticides with high potential to develop resistance (maximum number of applications to be clearly defined),
- Copper (guidelines have to define the maximum amount in kg per ha and year, taking into account both effects against diseases and against symbiotic bacteria for Olive fly)
- Post-emergence applications of herbicides are permitted in any case only after harvest,
- In case of soil preparation under the canopy for harvest, the use of residual herbicides with medium persistence is permitted, but their application has to be restricted in early autumn to avoid residues on the dropped olive fruits,
- The use of growth regulators is not permitted, except for thinning of table olives or to help mechanical harvesting,
- Persistent herbicides with DT90<1 vegetation period (spring-autumn): the situations of their exceptional use must be clearly specified (e.g. in the first three years after planting, maximum of one dose-equivalent per annum). and the risk of residues in olive oil be monitored.
*The list of "non-permitted" and "Permitted with restrictions" still contains group of active ingredients no longer allowed in Europe; if these groups are still allowed outside Europe than these rules must be followed:
|
The use of reduced dosages is recommended wherever possible in accordance with national documentation, experience and legislation.
In Europe EPPO standards are also used as references.
Adoption of anti-resistance strategies for the at-risk pesticides is strongly recommended. We may discuss for resistance development prevention measures and to add to consult resistance records –databases of the area, where available.
Adequate knowledge of the physical mode of action PhMoA) of pesticides (i.e., preventative, curative, antisporulant properties) and of rain fastness is recommended for pesticide choice and spray scheduling.
Levels of natural enemies' populations should be monitored and considered to select appropriate selective active ingredients.
|
9.3.2 Resistance management
|
Where the risk of resistance against a plant protection measure is known and where the level of pests, diseases or weeds requires repeated application of plant protection products in the crops, IP guidelines and IRAC / HRAC/ FRAC** have to provide clear recommendations or mandatory requests for an anti-resistance strategy to maintain the effectiveness of the products.
**:
- IRAC = Insecticide resistance action committee
- HRAC = Herbicide resistance action committee
- FRAC = fungicide resistance action committee
| |
9.4 Lists to be compiled as part of IP guidelines
|
IP guidelines must establish for each crop:
- A restrictive list of key pests, diseases and weeds that are economically important and require regular control measures in the region / crop concerned.
- A list of the most important known site-specific natural antagonist(s), with information on their importance in each crop. The protection and augmentation of at least 2 antagonists must be mentioned in advanced as a desirable objective sustainable production systems.
- A list of preventive and highly selective direct control measures to be used in the IP program (“green list”). See explanations and examples in the IOBC-WPRS Tool Box.
- A list of pesticides to be used with restrictions (“yellow list”): A selected group of plant protection products that do not qualify for the “green list” but should be available to the grower despite certain negative aspects, (especially for reasons of resistance management or earmarked for exceptionally difficult cases). These listed products are permitted only for precisely identified uses with clearly defined restrictions.
On the list of the most important known antagonist(s) of the key pests ("Passport") at least two key groups or species of natural enemies must be identified (i.e. coccinellids, chrysopids, anthocorids, hymenoptera parasitoids or phytoseiids, ground-dwelling arthropods) and their protection from non-selective insecticides, acaricides or fungicides be declared important.
Where important natural enemies are absent from olive-groves where the pest situation requires regular control measures (e.g. parasitoids of scale insects), they should be introduced, if available and effective.
| |
9.5 Application and recording of pesticides
|
All pesticide applications must be registered with name, date, crop-pest / crop- disease combination, dosage and field identification where applied.
Buffer zones of adequate size between treated crop areas and sensitive off-crop areas, (surface water, springs, ecological infrastructures), must be observed, (see point 2.6).
The official pre-harvest intervals to minimise pesticide residues must be followed and should, if possible, be extended. They must be recorded for all applications of crop protection product and evidence should be provided that they have been observed. In situations with continuous harvesting, systems must be in place in the field to ensure that safety rules are sufficiently followed (e.g. warning signals).
Spraying during windy weather conditions when wind velocity is exceeding 5m/sec, is not allowed.
|
It is strongly recommended that the application of pesticides is limited to the smallest possible area (e.g. band spraying, spot treatments, field and site specific localized treatment).
The use of best application techniques available to minimize drift and loss is highly recommended.
Small untreated areas, (zero treatment or "spray windows"), should be maintained in each crop and in each major plot/field except for arthropod pests, diseases and weeds declared as "highly dangerous/ contagious" by national authorities or in cases with high infectious pests or diseases.
Perennial crops: The use of methods to calculate the right dose of pesticides and spray volume to be applied as a function of the plant growth stage and canopy architecture - such as for instance the TRV (Tree Row Volume) or the LWA (Leaf Wall Area) methods – is highly recommended. Always explore this keeping in mind the specific properties of each pesticide-active ingredient.
Adaptation of pesticides doses to the real treated area and not to the cadastral area, and possibly to the foliar surface area instead of the soil surface.
The variable-dose approach, based on vigour maps, or on monitored or forecasted risk level is advised.
|
9.6 Efficient and safe storage and handling of pesticides
|
The basic requirements of Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) with respect to storage (9.6.1), safe handling application and training (9.6.2) and disposal of surplus mix, obsolete pesticides and empty containers (9.6.3), must be fulfilled and outlined in IP guidelines.
| |
9.6.1 Storage
|
Pesticides must be stored in accordance to legal regulations, in a locked room and separated from other materials. Keys and access to the pesticide store must be limited to workers with formal training in the handling of pesticides. Pesticides must only be stored in their original package.
| |
9.6.2 Safe handling, application and training
|
There must be adequate facilities for measuring, mixing and filling the products.
Adequate emergency facilities, such as running water, eyewash facilities, first aid box and emergency procedures, must be provided to deal with potential operator contamination.
Operators must have appropriate protective clothing and equipment for all operations involving chemicals.
All sprayer operators must have appropriate training and hold, where relevant, the appropriate certificate of competence.
| |
9.6.3 Disposal of surplus mix, obsolete pesticides and empty containers
|
Surplus mix or tank washings must either be sprayed onto a designated untreated part of the crop or disposed of by a registered waste contractor or applied in a biodegradation unit.
The safe disposal of spare pesticides must be planned and recorded. They must only be disposed of through an approved chemical waste contractor. Empty pesticide containers must be rinsed with water three times and the rinse water returned to the spray tank. Empty containers must not be re-used but should be crushed or perforated to prevent re-use.
|
Under normal circumstances surplus spray mix should not occur. However, if surplus should occur, disposal must comply with local regulations. Applications onto designated fallow land should demonstrate that this is legal practice and that there is no risk of surface water contamination.
|
9.7 Spraying equipment (pesticides) and technique
|
The basic requirements of Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) with respect to the operation and maintenance of spray equipment must be fulfilled and outlined in IP guidelines.
The equipment must be kept in a good state of repair. Adequate functioning of the equipment must be verified before each treatment. A thorough technical service of the equipment, (especially manometers and nozzles), should follow the national rules and obligations.
Equipment must be verified every 4 year (3 years from 2021) or according to the national guidelines by a competent organisation for correct operation and calibration.
The use of aircraft and helicopters is forbidden, except for situations where access to the plot is impossible because of exceptional weather conditions, or if plot topography allows no other way of spraying.
Radial flow air assisted sprayers traditionally used for tree and bush fruit spraying are often inefficient and generate high levels of spray drift. Wherever possible spraying equipment and spraying conditions minimising the health risk of the operator and drift must be preferred and tractors must be fitted with a cab.
The spray impact on the environment can be minimised by the proper calculation of the amount of product needed per ha.
|
The use of drift reduction techniques with the least drift and pesticide loss should be encouraged whilst maintaining efficacy.
When new sprayers are purchased, transverse flow design, or sprayers allowing treatment of each side of the row should where possible be selected. Atomizers must be equipped with stop drop system on the nozzles.
|
9.8 Pesticide residues
|
Legal requirements of pesticide residues must be fulfilled.
| |